KBOO radio host, Paul Roland, interviews electroshock survivor Michael Sturman and David Potter from Rethinking Psychiatry. What is it like to receive electroshock? What is it like to live afterwards with electroshock induced trauma? What is the significance of the recent legal victory in California over a shock machine manufacturer?

Michael Sturman has an M.A. in psychology from the University of Detroit (1969) and practiced psychology for over thirty years in a number of settings. At sixteen he was a patient at a state hospital in Michigan where he received 20-30 bilateral electroshock treatments, and underwent a long and difficult road to recovery. He is now retired, and lives in Eugene, Oregon.
Click here to read accompanying article on KBOO.FM.
Click the play button below to listen to the program. A transcript of the program is available here.


The evidence secured in the pending litigation has demonstrably reflected that FDA regulations have been blatantly ignored. The duty to “investigate and report” allegations of “serious injury or death” by the manufacturer has resulted in ZERO reported adverse events for over four decades, demonstrating a conscious disregard to comply with reporting obligations.





I have two grown sons. The knowledge and experience of their lives have basically been erased in my mind. I recently took a friend’s child to a play center where another family was having a birthday party for their child. I started to try to think of my own children’s’ birthdays and could not recall one. I became very distraught at this realization and began to weep. What presents were my child’s favorite? What did their cakes look like? What did they make me in school? What were their first words? What was it like to smell and hold them for the first time? What, did they want to be when they grew up? What about their proms? What about…?